Lincoln’s Greatest Speech

by Crocker on February 12, 2009, 10:13 pm

in History,Politics,Religion

Let us now praise famous men and our fathers who begat us.  Thus said Ben Sirah.  And there is much to praise when it comes to Abraham Lincoln.

In honor of Lincoln’s 200th birthday, let’s look at a portion of his greatest speech – a portion usually overlooked by historians. The speech is the Second Inaugural, delivered on March 4, 1865 – little more than a month before his assassination.

Like many of Lincoln’s public addresses, the speech is not long and took only about five minutes to read. Most people focus on the peroration “With malice toward none . . . . ” But while charity is a prominent theme, the speech is really a distillation of Lincoln’s agonized reflections about the war’s meaning.

Lincoln was by no means a conventional Christian. But he knew his Bible thoroughly and as the nation sank ever deeper in blood, he pored over its pages to find some divine purpose in the midst of great strife and sorrow.

He had come to believe in an overarching divine providence in human affairs and an inexplicable intermingling of human free will and divine necessity. And for Lincoln, the war was fundamentally about divine justice both to North and South for the sin of slavery.

Some historians – like David Herbert Donald – find Lincoln’s analysis chilling. I do not. [click to continue…]

The Gettysburg Address 150 Years On

by David Crocker on November 19, 2013, 8:49 pm

in History,Politics

Llincoln and Gettysburg AddressOld fogyish as it may sound, in my day school children were required to memorize the Gettysburg Address because it’s a brief catechism in the American religion of liberty. But the two-minute speech definitely got mixed reviews in the press of the day.

You see, Lincoln was invited to the dedication of the new National Cemetery at Gettysburg more or less as an afterthought.  The leading orator of the day, Edward Everett, was the featured speaker and Lincoln was solicited only to provide some brief remarks after Everett had concluded his address.  Lincoln drafted the speech on the train and in his room at Gettysburg the night before.

Everett’s address was a memorable two hour disquisition with classical overtones, including references to the honored dead in Pericles’ day.  The crowd was restless when Lincoln stood up to speak and most people weren’t even aware that Lincoln was speaking until he was finished.  Lincoln thought he had failed: “The speech won’t scour”, he said to his friend and bodyguard Ward Lamon, making a homely reference to a plow that wouldn’t turn the earth. “The speech is a flat failure and the people are disappointed.”

Some papers were hostile:

Chicago Times: “The cheeks of every American must tingle with shame as he reads the silly, flat, and dishwatery utterances.”

Some were laudatory:

Chicago Tribune: “The dedicatory remarks by President Lincoln will live among the annals of man.”

Springfield (Mass.) Republican: “Surprisingly fine as Mr. Everett’s oration was in the Gettysburg consecration, the rhetorical honors of the occasion were won by President Lincoln. His little speech is a perfect gem; deep in feeling, compact in thought and expression, and tasteful and elegant in every word and comma. Then it has the merit of unexpectedness in its verbal perfection and beauty… Turn back and read it over, it will repay study as a model speech. Strong feelings and a large brain are its parents.”

But the speech did scour – as we all know. Which makes it all the stranger that our president didn’t bother himself to attend the ceremonies in Gettysburg today.

What a missed opportunity.

Our ‘progressive’ masters have worked overtime to eradicate the Declaration of Independence and its natural law foundations from our national consciousness. The law professors tell us that the Declaration has no bearing on constitutional interpretation and, indeed, it shouldn’t even figure into our constitutional discussions. This, in spite of the 9th Amendment that recognizes other, natural rights not specifically enumerated in the Constitution.

But it was not always so. Abraham Lincoln revered the Declaration of Independence and the Founders. As Lincoln observed in 1861, “I have never had a feeling politically that did not spring from the sentiments embodied in the Declaration of Independence.” Lincoln viewed the language of the Declaration’s preamble not merely as revolutionary rhetoric but as a statement of political theology that stood inviolate in every time and every place. It’s small wonder that he frequently quoted it speeches like the Gettysburg Address.

But there’s one speech in which he discussed – with considerable passion – the meaning of the Declaration in a nation that accepted chattel slavery. The place was Lewistown, Illinois, and the date was August 17, 1858. Lincoln was deep into his senate race against The Little Giant, Stephen A. Douglas and the sole verbatim fragment of the speech comes to us from a Chicago Press and Tribune reporter. It’s worth reading carefully in its entirety.

The Declaration of Independence (said Mr. L.) was formed by the representatives of American liberty from thirteen States of the confederacy—twelve of which were slaveholding communities. We need not discuss the way or the reason of their becoming slaveholding communities. It is sufficient for our purpose that all of them greatly deplored the evil and that they placed a provision in the Constitution which they supposed would gradually remove the disease by cutting off its source. This was the abolition of the slave trade. So general was conviction—the public determination—to abolish the African slave trade, that the provision which I have referred to as being placed in the Constitution, declared that it should not be abolished prior to the year 1808. A constitutional provision was necessary to prevent the people, through Congress, from putting a stop to the traffic immediately at the close of the war. Now, if slavery had been a good thing, would the Fathers of the Republic have taken a step calculated to diminish its beneficent influences among themselves, and snatch the boon wholly from their posterity? These communities, by their representatives in old Independence Hall, said to the whole world of men: “We hold these truths to be self evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” This was their majestic interpretation of the economy of the Universe. This was their lofty, and wise, and noble understanding of the justice of the Creator to His creatures. [Applause.] Yes, gentlemen, to all His creatures, to the whole great family of man. In their enlightened belief, nothing stamped with the Divine image and likeness was sent into the world to be trodden on, and degraded, and imbruted by its fellows. They grasped not only the whole race of man then living, but they reached forward and seized upon the farthest posterity. They erected a beacon to guide their children and their children’s children, and the countless myriads who should inhabit the earth in other ages. Wise statesmen as they were, they knew the tendency of prosperity to breed tyrants, and so they established these great self-evident truths, that when in the distant future some man, some faction, some interest, should set up the doctrine that none but rich men, or none but white men, were entitled to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, their posterity might look up again to the Declaration of Independence and take courage to renew the battle which their fathers began—so that truth, and justice, and mercy, and all the humane and Christian virtues might not be extinguished from the land; so that no man would hereafter dare to limit and circumscribe the great principles on which the temple of liberty was being built. [Loud cheers.]

Now, my countrymen (Mr. Lincoln continued with great earnestness,) if you have been taught doctrines conflicting with the great landmarks of the Declaration of Independence; if you have listened to suggestions which would take away from its grandeur, and mutilate the fair symmetry of its proportions; if you have been inclined to believe that all men are not created equal in those inalienable rights enumerated by our chart of liberty, let me entreat you to come back. Return to the fountain whose waters spring close by the blood of the Revolution. Think nothing of me—take no thought for the political fate of any man whomsoever—but come back to the truths that are in the Declaration of Independence. You may do anything with me you choose, if you will but heed these sacred principles. You may not only defeat me for the Senate, but you may take me and put me to death. While pretending no indifference to earthly honors, I do claim to be actuated in this contest by something higher than an anxiety for office. I charge you to drop every paltry and insignificant thought for any man’s success. It is nothing; I am nothing; Judge Douglas is nothing. But do not destroy that immortal emblem of Humanity—the Declaration of American Independence.